First of all, for those  unfamiliar with this one, it is based on the unfinished last     novel of American author Edith Wharton (more famous for her novels  The House of Mirth ,     Ethan Frome
,     Ethan Frome and The Age of Innocence
 and The Age of Innocence ).  It was written in 1938, but  it is set in     late Victorian America and England.  It chronicles the story of four  spirited American     girls, ostracized by New York high society as nouveau riche, who  decide to venture     to London for “the season” to improve their chances of acceptance  and marriage when     they get back to America.  What happens, of course, is that they all  end up making     matches in England and mayhem ensues....
).  It was written in 1938, but  it is set in     late Victorian America and England.  It chronicles the story of four  spirited American     girls, ostracized by New York high society as nouveau riche, who  decide to venture     to London for “the season” to improve their chances of acceptance  and marriage when     they get back to America.  What happens, of course, is that they all  end up making     matches in England and mayhem ensues....
The fact that Edith Wharton based  this story on real girls who had gone to England     and married “well” but not always prudently (Conseulo Vanderbilt to  the Duke of Marlborough     and Jennie Jerome to Lord Randolph Churchill) , makes this very  compelling. The adaptation     is beautiful to look at first of all, filmed all on location and  with gorgeous costumes.      The late Victorian period is absolutely over the top with bustles  and flounces and     ribbons and.....well, you get the idea.
The casting was brilliant as  well, with the main character of Nan St. George, played     brilliantly by a young and delightfully plump Carla Gugino. You can  really feel her     emotions as she goes from a teenager trying to keep up with her  beautiful sister     Virginia (also well done by Alison Elliot) to a Duchess (whoops,  plot spoiler).  I     won’t tell you how her marriage works out as that makes up a good  part of the adaptation.     Virginia’s marriage and those of her friends Conchita (Mira Sorvino  having the time     of her life) and Lizzy (Rya Kihlstedt) give this sweeping and  enthralling miniseries     lots of meaty plot.
I love the locations too, with  the ever lovely Castle Howard in Yorkshire seen in     all it’s glory as the country home of the Duke and Duchess of  Trevenick.  There are     some gorgeous scenes in Newport, Rhode Island as well as the lovely  Stanway House     in Gloucestershire as Honourslove, the home of the dreamy Guy  Thwaite.  Mmmmm.....
As a warning to those with  preteen girls, there are a few scenes which more protective     parents may not want them to see.  They actually may be appreciated  for parents of     older or more worldly teens as promoting some interesting  discussions of sexual orientation     and of venereal disease.  Like I said, lots of juicy plot.
Many people posting to the  Buccaneers IMDb page seem to have a lot of sympathy for     the character of Julius (the Duke of Trevenick), and that the  marriage may have turned     out better if there had been better communication on both sides, as  there was genuine     affection in the beginning.  Well, watch it and see if you feel this  way, or see     if he just creeps you out.  These days, Julius would probably be  diagnosed as having     Asperger’s syndrome with his lack of people reading skills and his  love of clocks.      He is one of the most fascinating characters you will come across  in any of these     adaptations.
The five hour-long episodes give  lots of play to the minor characters too, with Cherie     Lunghi as the world weary governess Laura Testvalley, Michael  Kitchen as a rather     intriguing Sir Helmsley Thwaite and best of all James Frain as the  uber complex Julius.
In any case, you should find Nan  delightful and I hope you will agree that the role     of Guy Thwaite was wonderfully played by a young Greg Wise. I  haven’t read the novel and so I don’t know how much of the ending was added or changed from  what Edith Wharton     intended.  I rather think that the ending is happier than she would  have written,     judging by her other works.  This is probably good for me as I  prefer the happily     ever after.
     and so I don’t know how much of the ending was added or changed from  what Edith Wharton     intended.  I rather think that the ending is happier than she would  have written,     judging by her other works.  This is probably good for me as I  prefer the happily     ever after.
There have been some critical  comments about the melodrama of the production (more     to do with the script than the production I think) and of some of  the acting, but     I am inclined to disagree on both counts.  I like to think of the  plot as chockablock     full of great stuff rather than melodramatic, and there are very few  moments where     the acting is less than great.
Anyhow, I think you get the idea  of what this production is like and if it sounds     like one you want to see, then you are my kindred spirit.  In any  case, you will     not be bored with this production as it pulls you along at a great  pace, almost to     the point of being hard to follow if you get distracted at a key  moment.  So have     fun with this one if you haven’t yet seen it.
Oh and one more thing.  If any  BBC producers are reading this, I would like to suggest     a dramatization of the life of Jennie Jerome, Lady Randolph Churchill and the  mother     of Winston Churchill.  A real life Buccaneer, she was a gorgeous,  smart, rich American     girl who led an absolutely astoundingly interesting life and charmed  the aristocracy     of England.  Any takers for this?
 
 
Considering Laura Testvalley's fate, Annabel's estrangement from Virginia and Guy being disinherited by his father . . . I wouldn't exactly regard the ending as being that happy.
ReplyDelete